Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jo tedesco's avatar

Although the research and recommendations are more than 10 years old, strata stakeholders have not caught up with the realities of climate change. The following is an example of an issue that will become increasingly common, especially in apartment buildings from the 1960s.

Our 24-apartment building was constructed in the 60s. Gas was used for stoves, space heating, and hot water—keeping pressure off an electrical system, which was never designed to carry the full load of all-electric living.

Now, with the removal of gas, these apartments must convert to fully electric appliances. This includes electric stoves, electric heating, and electric hot water—a significant jump in demand.

So what happens?

• In one apartment, too many appliances running at once can trip the circuit. It’s annoying, but easy enough to reset.

• Across the building, if multiple apartments (especially on the same electrical phase) are drawing heavy loads at the same time, the main switchboard can overload. This can cause a blackout—or worse, damage the electrical infrastructure.

And yet, the Owners Corporation’s position is a deeply flawed and short-sighted one:

“It’s the individual owner's problem. The benefit principle would apply. The gas pipe only serves one lot.”

The real issue here is the capacity and safety of shared infrastructure.

When the main switchboard fails, it doesn’t just affect one resident—it affects everyone. And repairing major building systems isn’t a private cost—it’s a strata cost.

This is exactly what climate adaptation means in practice: anticipating these systemic impacts and addressing them collectively, not reactively. Whether it’s upgrading switchboards, managing overheating risks, or future-proofing plumbing and stormwater systems—strata buildings need to be planning for it now.

Expand full comment

No posts